About Me
Name: Kelly Wolske

Maryland born, Florida raised, and transplanted to the Mojave for the love of my husband. Big Red's wife, Tele's mom, part time student. Child of God, Christ follower, United Methodist in exile. More than anything I strive to hear His voice every single day.

My Complete Profile


Links
Chocaholic Pachyderm
The Journey We Call Faith
World Magazine
Feminists for Life
Libertarian Christians?

Photos
www.flickr.com

Recent Posts
We laughed out loud...
A day late and a dollar short, I suppose
Mini rant. (Maybe a runt?)
For Sale... Cheap!
My Love-Hate Relationship with Technology
This man needs a diction coach!
Where have all the churches gone?
No willpower.
The Problem of Men
I feel your pain, man!

Archives
02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004
03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004
09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004
06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007
06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007
07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007
09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007
11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007
12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008
04/01/2008 - 05/01/2008
06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008
07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008
09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008
10/01/2008 - 11/01/2008
11/01/2008 - 12/01/2008
12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009
08/01/2009 - 09/01/2009
09/01/2012 - 10/01/2012

Blogrolls
Blogging Chicks []


Christian Women Online
Blog Ring

Join | List | Random


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Click here to join
Credits
Blog Design by:


Image from:
istockphoto

Powered by:


Meter:



Miscellaneous
Reading: The Pilgrim's Progress
Project: Sewing/ craft corner







Tuesday, June 20, 2006
In case you need a reminder...

... Of why I am not a fan of the UN, here is yet another attempt to undermine the sovreignty of memeber-states.

I am by no means an isolationist, mainly because I recognise that much is expected of those to whom much is given. I do think that representative democracy should be encouraged-- even if we disagree with the laws selected by new governments.

However, this kind of vague language is what chafes:

Article 13

1. The child shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of the child's choice.

2. The exercise of this right may be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:
(a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others; or

(b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.

Article 14

1. States Parties shall respect the right of the child to freedom of thought, conscience and religion.

2. States Parties shall respect the rights and duties of the parents and, when applicable, legal guardians, to provide direction to the child in the exercise of his or her right in a manner consistent with the evolving capacities of the child.

3. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health or morals, or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.

Article 15
1. States Parties recognize the rights of the child to freedom of association and to freedom of peaceful assembly.

2. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of these rights other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

Article 16
1. No child shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his or her privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his or her honour and reputation.

2. The child has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 17
States Parties recognize the important function performed by the mass media and shall ensure that the child has access to information and material from a diversity of national and international sources, especially those aimed at the promotion of his or her social, spiritual and moral well-being and physical and mental health. To this end, States Parties shall:

(a) Encourage the mass media to disseminate information and material of social and cultural benefit to the child and in accordance with the spirit of article 29;

(b) Encourage international co-operation in the production, exchange and dissemination of such information and material from a diversity of cultural, national and international sources;

(c) Encourage the production and dissemination of children's books;

(d) Encourage the mass media to have particular regard to the linguistic needs of the child who belongs to a minority group or who is indigenous;

(e) Encourage the development of appropriate guidelines for the protection of the child from information and material injurious to his or her well-being, bearing in mind the provisions of articles 13 and 18.


I must say, it is very generous of them to concede that parents and guardians have cartain rights, within their abilities, of course!

According to the website, the US has signed this convention, but it hasn't been ratified by our legislature. As with many of these conventions, it sounds like such a great idea. However, upon closer examination, we see one by one, nations signing away their rights. Those who may object are villified, and globalization claims another.

  posted at 6:41 AM  
  1 comments



1 Comments:
At 6/20/2006 08:39:00 PM, Blogger Dana said...

I agree. The ambiguity of the language is the most difficult with this. Opposing it sounds like you are against children, and it is hard to pick out specific points to really object to, because they don't really say anything for the most part. Leaving it wide open for inconsistent interpretation and application.

We see how it is playing out in Brussels and what happened earlier in England...two nations that by and large should not be the target of this treaty. This should be for all those nations that signed, but filed lengthy objections about how Islam was their state religion and would remain as such, and other policies which stood in clear contrast to the stated goals of the convention.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home